Women's Safety Concerns About Traffic Scheme Must Be Addressed


Greg Hands MP for Chelsea and Fulham reporting back

Greg Hands with Hillary Cannon a local business owner who has been campaigning on this issue
Greg Hands with Hillary Cannon a local business owner who has been campaigning on this issue

February 19, 2024

Dear Resident,

As you will know, cameras have been installed and traffic measures put in place by Hammersmith & Fulham Council (LBHF) to restrict non-borough traffic driving through the area with the aim of pushing traffic on to the main roads of Fulham. These are called the SW6 Traffic Schemes.

However, since the introduction of the controversial schemes by LBHF, I have been contacted by countless residents and businesses about their impact on the local area.

Last year, I decided to survey residents on the SW6 Traffic Schemes and over 3,800 residents across Chelsea and Fulham responded to the survey, with every part of the constituency being opposed to the schemes. 70% of respondents across Chelsea & Fulham do not support the schemes.

Following these results, I have been urging the council to conduct a full Fulham-wide traffic management study alongside a Fulham-wide consultation to end this divisive and piecemeal approach that has turned neighbour against neighbour.

The Council have followed my lead and in 2024 - 4 years after introducing the schemes - has decided to consult residents on their SW6 Traffic Schemes. However, I am concerned, due to their survey questions. The survey closed on Friday, 2 February. I continue to follow very closely for developments.

The scheme as it is currently designed, is impacting local businesses and impacts those who depend on cars from time to time - like those using Ubers, those who have carers from outside the local area, the disabled, those who depend on deliveries of medicines, and so on.

A very serious concern shared by local women and women-owned businesses, which has been reflected in recent media coverage, is that many Uber (and other mobile app taxi services) drivers are refusing to enter the area(s) due to fear of being fined. Alarmingly, this is resulting in women not being dropped off at their front doors, and instead women are dropped off outside of the zone(s). Women are then having to walk home, often alone, at night.

A poster issued by Greg Hands on the issue
A poster issued by Greg Hands on the issue promoting his petition

I have, of course, been in contact with the local business owner, Hillary Cannon, who has taken up the campaign against the traffic scheme with skill and gusto. As we have seen, she has posted on social media a forceful message, with which I fully agree, highlighting the issue of women’s safety and has since set up a WhatsApp safety group for women who live in the neighbourhood. I am working with Hillary to amplify this important issue and have thanked her for everything she is doing for our community.

Hillary contacted the Council on the issue - directly to the Council Leader and to the Council Deputy Leader - without (to date) receiving any reply from LBHF. I am very disappointed that the Council does not seem to want to engage with Hillary, her complaints or women’s safety issue more generally. I urge them to re-think their intransigence.

Women’s safety is an important issue that needs to be urgently addressed by Hammersmith & Fulham Council.

Ensuring that residents feel safe is a priority for me. Residents and business owners are calling for action and so am I. Therefore, I have launched a petition calling on the council to suspend the SW6 Traffic Schemes until women’s safety concerns are addressed. You can read more about it and sign by clicking here!

Best wishes,

Greg Hands

The Rt Hon Greg Hands MP

Member of Parliament for Chelsea & Fulham

You can follow Greg on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram by searching for @GregHands

 

Value Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.