Wandsworth Declines to Support Hammersmith Bridge Funding Bid
H&F councillor accuses it of 'playing political games'
Cllr Nicole Trehy said that Wandsworth's approach increases risk of a total closure of the bridge
August 14, 2026
Wandsworth Council has refused to support a funding bid to keep Hammersmith Bridge open for pedestrians, cyclists and river traffic.
Wandsworth Council’s Tory administration wrote to Hammersmith and Fulham Council officials stating it could not support the Labour-run council’s bid for £128 million from the Governments £1 billion Structures Fund for essential repairs to the bridge, as it fell short of what residents and businesses wanted to see.
Hammersmith and Fulham, which owns the Grade II* listed bridge, had hoped to secure £300m to fully restore the bridge, but a report by council officers said the Department for Transport (DfT) had instead recommended it apply for a “phased repair” to keep the bridge open for pedestrians, cyclists and river traffic.
The council said in July there was no financial option available to fully restore the crossing, which would “essentially require a brand-new bridge to be built”.
The fund criteria also says the latest date for eligible schemes to reach completion is March 31, 2030, which does not allow for full restoration of the bridge.
Hammersmith and Fulham wrote to neighbouring authorities requesting stakeholder support for its bid.
This was rejected by Wandsworth, with new leader Robert Morritt writing to Hammersmith and Fulham councillor Nicole Trehy, cabinet member for travel, stating the authority was “extremely disappointed” by the bid.
Councillor Trehy said it was a “matter of deep regret” that Wandsworth was allegedly “playing political games”, and the council would rather work constructively with the borough to secure the bridge’s future.
In his letter, Councillor Morritt said the bid fell “well short of what the vast majority of residents and businesses in the immediate area and across London would like to see.”
He voiced support for plans designed by architects Foster and Partners, announced in 2020, to build a temporary double-decker crossing that would potentially allow vehicles to use the bridge while it is fully repaired. Pedestrians would cross on the lower deck and cars on the upper level.
Councillor Morritt wrote: “This key crossing has been closed to full operation for over seven years now and expecting partners to be satisfied it will remain shut to motor vehicles for a likely further decade is not tolerable.”
Conservative councillor Nick Austin, cabinet member for travel, also said: “In 2019, Fleur Anderson MP campaigned in Putney on a platform that national government should foot the bill for repairing Hammersmith Bridge.
“Seven years on, Labour run every level of government – Hammersmith and Fulham Council, City Hall, and national government – so if Labour wanted to reopen the bridge, they could.
“The Conservatives will not support any bid that does not reopen Hammersmith Bridge to all modes of transport.”
Ms Anderson has vowed to continue fighting for the full restoration of the bridge.
Councillor Trehy said Hammersmith and Fulham had received Wandsworth’s letter two days after the deadline for submissions to the Structures Fund, and that it did not offer any contribution towards the cost of repairs or recognise the cash the authority had already spent keeping it open – mainly for residents south of the river.
“Nor does it acknowledge the failure of the previous national government to reimburse H&F for the agreed share of our spending on bridge repairs,” she claimed.
The crossing was built in 1887 and is one of the world’s oldest suspension bridges.
It was shut in April 2019 after inspectors found micro-fractures in each of its four cast iron pedestals, which indicated a risk of “catastrophic collapse”.
It has since reopened to pedestrians, cyclists and river traffic, with Hammersmith and Fulham spending £54m to maintain the structure.
The Government struck a deal with TfL in 2021 to split the cost of repairs three ways with Hammersmith and Fulham.
A report by Hammersmith and Fulham officers said: “The council’s position – in line with this one-thirds principle – is that it is still owed money due from TfL, primarily, and DfT towards the £54m that has been spent on the restoration project.”
Councillor Trehy added: “Wandsworth’s new leadership has completely missed the point that these works are essential to keep the bridge open safely for pedestrians and cyclists, regardless of any longer-term debate about motor vehicles. If the bid is not successful, the bridge is likely to have to close to everyone within 12 months.
“We would much rather work constructively with Wandsworth and our other neighbours to secure the future of the bridge.
“Briefing against this funding bid risks exactly the opposite outcome – the complete closure of Hammersmith Bridge, including to Wandsworth residents who rely on it.
“It is a matter of deep regret that a neighbouring borough, with so much to gain from the bridge remaining open, seeks to damage our bid – and the travel options of its own residents – by playing political games.”
An announcement on whether the £128m bid has been successful is expected in autumn.
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |