Task Force to Consider Temporary Road Traffic Bridge


Borough leader receives assurances that option will be investigated


A previous design for a traffic bridge which was rejected. Picture: Beckitt Rankine

The head of the government’s Hammersmith Bridge Task Force has told the leader of Wandsworth Council that a temporary traffic crossing will be considered while the bridge remains closed

Ravi Govindia secured the assurance from roads minister Baroness Vere of Norbiton, who is leading the Government Taskforce charged with overseeing repairs to the bridge which are now expected to take over six years.

Cllr Govindia had earlier written to the Baroness calling on the Taskforce to take steps to relieve the pressure on Putney High Street, Putney Bridge and Wandsworth Bridge, which he claims have all taken the brunt of the additional spillover traffic since Hammersmith Bridge’s closure in April 2019

In his letter Cllr Govindia said, “I very much welcome the setting up of the Taskforce and am grateful to you for taking the lead on pursuing the delivery of the desperately needed works to Hammersmith Bridge.

“The residents and businesses of Wandsworth continue to suffer intolerable delays as a result of its closure and the considerable traffic pressure particularly on the network of roads leading to Putney and Wandsworth Bridges.”

Referring to reports that the Taskforce was considering the construction of a temporary foot and cycle bridge at Hammersmith, but not a road crossing Cllr Govindia added, “Whilst I do not doubt that temporary foot/cycle solutions will provide some relief at our bridges, I very much doubt that the numbers, they will carry and attract, will be anywhere near significant enough to prevent a continuing problem for the residents and businesses of Wandsworth, and indeed the many schoolchildren who cross the river as well.

“This comes at a bad time of course, given our desire to support the continued opening of schools and to do all we can to aid economic recovery through the pandemic.

“It would be good to hear your thoughts on these matters and whether or not there is in fact more focus on an early road traffic solution than would at first appear to be the case.”

It is understood that, although Transport for London (TfL) had drawn up plans for a temporary bridge for the use of pedestrians and cyclists and requested funding as part of the most recent financial package, the Task Force have not recommended that the plans be proceeded with at this point.

In her reply to the letter the minister acknowledged “the difficulties people are experiencing following the closure of Hammersmith Bridge, adding, “The Department is continuing to work with local groups and stakeholders, to consider all the options available to help deliver an immediate solution – including any temporary measures that can be brought in to help reduce traffic in surrounding areas.

“The Taskforce has not ruled out other potential temporary solutions, including proposals for a temporary bridge as we work through plans to stabilise the Bridge and ultimately return it to full use.

“We are committed to exploring any other feasible options that will alleviate the impact of the Bridge’s closure on neighbouring areas.”

Following the exchange of letters Cllr Govindia said, “I’m pleased that the minister has expressed her commitment to exploring the option of a temporary road crossing and that she not only recognises the frustration of our residents but also the undeniable lack of local leadership that has afflicted this project for the past 18 months.

“We are no nearer having this important river crossing reopened than we were back in April of last year, so I’m relieved that the Taskforce has been set up and that we can now look forward to getting to grips with a situation that has frankly already dragged on for far too long.

“And while we recognise the difficult challenges and complexities involved in building a temporary road crossing we are heartened to learn that it is something the minister has committed to exploring in order to bring relief to our residents and businesses.”

After the closure of the bridge, engineering consultants Beckitt Rankine submitted outline proposals for a temporary bridge that could take motor vehicles, however these were rejected by TfL. It is understood that integrating the temporary traffic bridge with the existing road network would be extremely challenging and some observers say that the idea is impractical.

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.


November 11, 2020