Public enquiry likely into 20 storey building proposed on Clem Attlee estate
Visualisation of building looking along North End Road
A plan to build a 20 storey tower on the Clem Attlee Estate has been ‘called in’ by the Housing Minister.
This means that the decision of Hammersmith & Fulham Council to approve the latest attempt to build a replacement for Edith Summerskill House on St Thomas’s Way may now be subject to a public enquiry with the decision ultimately made by the government.
In a letter to Greg Hands MP, the Minister for State for Housing, Christopher Pincher said the government is ‘very selective’ on planning applications it calls in as it is normally right for the local planning authority to make the decision but in this case ‘planning issues of more than local importance are involved’. The Minister has written to Hammersmith & Fulham Council explaining its decision.
The proposals are for a 20 storey high tower containing 133 flats. There were only 68 flats in the previous building on the site which was built in the sixties, vacated in 2011 and demolished in 2017.
The applicant is HFS Developments 2 Limited which is a joint venture with Stanhope PLC. It is understood that the council was intending to transfer the site to Peabody Housing Trust, a housing association. 80% of the flats were to be social rented; 20% will be intermediate housing; 10% of the flats will be designed for wheelchair residents.
Councillor Andrew Jones, the Labour council’s cabinet member for the economy, said, “The Government should withdraw this objection immediately.
“After a decade of austerity and a drastic shortage of affordable housing, it’s breathtaking that they should now decide to stop the re-development of the former Edith Summerskill House. We’re simply seeking to provide new, genuinely affordable homes for local people.”
Artist's impression of building planned for Edith Summerskill House site
This is the second time the council has tried to secure planning permission for new flats on the site, only to have it called-in by the government.
It is understood that a planning barrister, Richard Turney, who lives nearby, also made a separate request for the application to be called-in.
Mr Turney was the man behind the first challenge, in which he beat the council’s officers by convincing a planning inspector to send the scheme back to the drawing board.
Before the scheme was decided on by the council’s planning committee in October last year, 34 residents had submitted objections a much lower level than some more controversial recent applications.
Mr Turney told councillors on the committee that they should reject it, as it was “too tall and too bulky”, and because the council’s Local Plan did not designate the area as being suitable for a tall building.
The committee was also told by council planning officer Peter Wilson that a future appeal against the council would fail, because the new scheme is a significant improvement on the site being vacant.
The new tower would be 20 metres taller than its predecessor, and features distinctive arched windows and a ground floor “arcade”.
The planning reference number is 2020/01283/FUL.
Written with contributions from Owen Sheppard - Local Democracy Reporter
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More
This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.
Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.
We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.
However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.
We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.
A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact email@example.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.
One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.
If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.
For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.
June 14, 2021