While Questions Mount over Council Decision to Close School

Councillor asks what closure has to do with Fulham Boys School

Related Links
Save Sulivan School logo

Sulivan School Closure "Called In" by Education Select Commitee

Agenda for Full Council Meeting, January 29

The Cowan Report

"Heartless" Council Votes to Close Sulivan Primary School

Save Our Sulivan on Twitter

Agenda for the Cabinet Meeting, January 20

Supplementary Agenda with Updated Report

Boris Johnson Admits Sulivan School into Gold Club

London Mayor Refuses to Support Sulivan School

Sulivan School Consultation Period Extended

Unanimous Support at Meeting for Sulivan's Academy Plans

Sulivan Primary School to Apply for Academy Status

London Diocesan Board for Schools

Packed Meeting Hears Case for Sulivan School

Save Sulivan Campaigners Call for Support at Town Hall

Parents Begin Fight to Save Sulivan School

Hammersmith and Fulham Council's Full Proposal

Online questionnaire

Save Sulivan School on Facebook

Sulivan Primary School

New King's School

The Fulham Boys School

Fullham Boys School Postpones Opening Until September 2014


Sign up for our free newsletter

Comment on this story on the

Questions are mounting over Hammersmith and Fulham cabinet's decision on January 20 to closes Sulivan Primary School in Fulham, which has now been "called in" by the Hammersmith and Fulham Education Select Committee.

On his blog The Cowan Report  Stephen Cowan, Leader of the Labour Group of Councillors, reveals that all four independent co-opted voting members of the Select Committee joined with three Labour Opposition councillors to produce a majority of one.

He says: " This is the first time any Select Committee has ever called in a cabinet decision. I know it won't have been done lightly. This is a summary of the reasons they gave:

  • The Cabinet has not properly considered the school’s excellent performance.
  • The Council have miscalculated the detrimental effect the closure will have on the children’s education.
  • The Council effectively blocked attempts to increase the school’s numbers.
  • The Council has misled the public during the consultation on the schools results, popularity and the reasons for its closure.
  • The Cabinet has given undue consideration to the views, requirements and preferences of the founders of the Fulham Boys School."

He adds: "The controversial closure will now be reviewed at an emergency meeting. There is much that needs to be considered about the curious goings on behind all of this.

"Here's just two of the most important questions:

  1. Why close a primary school whose latest SATs results place it as 233rd out of 16,884 primaries in England and put it firmly into the top 2% of schools in the country?
  2. Exactly what does this closure have to do with the proposed Fulham Boys School?
" On Monday, Cabinet Members Cllr. Helen Binmore (Con), Cllr. Georgie Cooney  (Con) and Cllr. Nicholas Botterill  (Con) all claimed the answer to that last question is absolutely nothing. But here’s what we know:
  • Sulivan Primary School has been set aside by the Conservative Administration as the site for the FBS.
  • There was a well organised campaign during the statutory consultation on the closure of Sulivan Primary School to encourage people to write in and state their support for FBS.
  • Conservative councillors agreed to count around 950 of those FBS statutory consultation responses amongst those they claimed were backing Sulivan’s closure in the report that was presented to the Borough's cabinet.
  • Sulivan is the preferred site of those behind the FBS bid. On 24th November 2013, a council official wrote an email which stated: "I spoke to Alex Wade, the founder of the Fulham Boys’ School last week… He also confirmed that, should the proposals go ahead, he did not see your alternative plan as workable and that the clear preference of the Fulham Boys’ School governors and Head teacher would be for a new secondary school on the larger and more suitable Sulivan site."
  • Conservative councillors have taken legal advice: one on whether or not to publically declare a "friendship"; and two on whether to declare a “number of people they know” behind the FBS  bid. They have been advised "this declaration is not a declaration of interests required under the code" and they have "no interest to declare". While nobody is suggesting anything improper has happened, we do now need to see a full list of all dates that elected representatives met with people behind FBS and discussed or referred to the bid or potential sites.
  • Minutes from a meeting on 20th November 2013 with Greg Hands  MP for Chelsea and Fulham, allege other excellent schools were also considered for closure so FBS could take their sites. The minutes state: “Greg commented that it was extremely difficult to find sites for new schools within the Borough. Greg was aware that FBS has looked at many sites over the last two years. Greg personally had tried to help FBS to find a site controlled by local or central government including the MOD site in Rylston Road, All Saints vicarage, All Saints School and The Moat School  – none of which has proved suitable for FBS."

Cllr Cowan concludes: "It appears that the FBS proposals have absolutely everything to do with the proposed closure of Sulivan Primary School.

" It would be unwise for the Conservative Administration to play down this call-in or try to bulldoze the process through.

" It would also be a huge concern and raise questions about their credibility if the six Conservative councillors on the Education and Children's Services Select Committee (one of whom is the Conservatives' newly selected prospective parliamentary candidate for Hammersmith) failed to properly take up their responsibilities to look into and act on these matters."

January 29, 2014